Governance. Risk. Compliance. Cybersecurity.
Cybersecurity

AI Platform VAPT — LLM & ML Penetration Testing

Offensive testing for LLM apps, RAG pipelines, agents and MLOps platforms.

AI Platform VAPT — LLM & ML Penetration Testing — glowing padlock over an enterprise network circuit board, MAST Consulting Group

Overview

Specialist vulnerability assessment and penetration testing for AI platforms — generative AI applications, RAG pipelines, autonomous agents, fine-tuned and self-hosted models, and the MLOps infrastructure behind them. Aligned to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 controls, our AI red team probes prompt injection, jailbreaks, model abuse, data leakage, supply-chain risk and agent misuse with proof-of-concept exploits and remediation guidance your engineering team can ship.

At a glance

Process flow, compliance checklist and benefits.

A visual breakdown of how the engagement runs, what evidence we leave behind, and the business outcomes you can defend at the board.

Process flow

How we deliver AI Platform VAPT — LLM & ML Penetration Testing.

  1. 01
    Threat Modelling

    Map model inventory, data flows, agent tools and trust boundaries against OWASP LLM Top 10 and MITRE ATLAS tactics.

  2. 02
    Adversarial Testing

    Prompt injection (direct and indirect), jailbreaks, system-prompt leakage, training-data extraction, model DoS, RAG corpus poisoning and tool/function-call abuse.

  3. 03
    Platform & Pipeline

    Pentest the surrounding stack — vector DBs, inference endpoints, fine-tuning pipelines, MLOps tooling, model registries and identity boundaries.

  4. 04
    Reporting

    Risk-ranked report with PoCs, screen captures, repeatable payload library and CVSS-aligned scoring.

  5. 05
    Re-test

    Validation of remediated findings and tuning of guardrails, evaluators and detection rules.

Compliance checklist

What auditors and regulators expect to see.

Every item below is part of an audit-ready AI Platform VAPT — LLM & ML Penetration Testing programme — what regulators, certification bodies and enterprise buyers expect to see.

  • Scope and applicability statement

    Confirmed boundaries for AI Platform VAPT — LLM & ML Penetration Testing across entities, locations and systems.

  • Gap assessment report

    Current-state diagnostic with prioritised, owner-tagged findings.

  • Policy and procedure suite

    Approved by top management, version-controlled and communicated to staff.

  • Risk register and treatment plan

    Threats, controls, residual risk and accepted exceptions documented.

  • Awareness and role-based training

    Attendance, content and assessment evidence retained.

  • Evidence repository

    Central, auditor-accessible, timestamped artefacts per control.

  • Internal audit and management review

    Independent assurance run before any external assessment.

  • Continuous improvement log

    Findings, corrective actions and re-test evidence tracked to closure.

Benefits

What you walk away with.

OWASP LLM Top 10 and MITRE ATLAS-mapped findings with exploit PoCs
Prompt-injection, jailbreak and tool-abuse test corpus reusable for regression testing
Training-data, RAG-corpus and model-supply-chain risk assessment
Evidence pack ready for ISO 42001, EU AI Act and enterprise AI assurance reviews
FAQ

Frequently asked questions.

Which AI systems do you test?+

LLM chatbots, RAG applications, autonomous agents with tool use, fine-tuned and self-hosted models (Llama, Mistral, Falcon), embedded copilots, Azure OpenAI / Bedrock / Vertex deployments and traditional ML scoring services.

How is this different from a normal web pentest?+

We cover all the usual application and API attack surface, plus AI-specific threats: prompt injection, jailbreaks, training-data and system-prompt extraction, model and vector-DB poisoning, agent tool abuse, and inference-cost denial-of-wallet attacks.

Do you align to OWASP LLM Top 10 and MITRE ATLAS?+

Yes — every finding is mapped to OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025), MITRE ATLAS techniques and the relevant NIST AI RMF / ISO 42001 control so the evidence pack drops into your governance programme.

Can your report be used for ISO 42001, EU AI Act or SOC 2 AI add-ons?+

Yes. Reports are written to satisfy ISO/IEC 42001 evaluation evidence, EU AI Act high-risk testing obligations, and enterprise AI assurance questionnaires from BFSI and healthcare buyers.

Will testing leak our prompts or fine-tuned weights?+

No. Engagements run under NDA with payload sandboxing; any extracted system prompts, embeddings or weights are reported then securely destroyed. We can test fully air-gapped against a customer-controlled environment.

How long does an AI platform pentest take?+

Single LLM application: 7 to 12 working days. Multi-agent or RAG-heavy platforms: 3 to 5 weeks. Full red team against an AI-enabled product line: 4 to 8 weeks.

Do you cover the MLOps and training pipeline?+

Yes — model registries, CI/CD for models, vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate, pgvector), feature stores and inference gateways are in scope when present. We test supply-chain risk in third-party models and datasets.

Can this be part of an existing VAPT or red team retainer?+

Yes. AI platform testing slots into our standard VAPT retainer and feeds the same reporting, attestation and re-test workflow your security team already uses.

Free download

The AI Platform VAPT Checklist.

A 12-section, practitioner-grade checklist used by our AI red team — covering prompt injection, RAG, agents and tool calling, MLOps, supply chain and governance mapping to OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001.

Download the checklist (PDF)
Gated by a short form. No credit card.
Get started

Ready to scope your AI Platform VAPT engagement?

Tell us a little about your business — a senior consultant will reach out within one business day.

By submitting you agree to be contacted by a MAST consultant. We never share your details.